Wydawnictwo
AWSGE
AWSGE
Akademia Nauk Stosowanych
WSGE
im. Alcide De Gasperi
WSGE
im. Alcide De Gasperi
BOOK CHAPTER (301-314)
Together as stewards of the fundamental right
of data protection
From the notion of consent and accountability
to moral responsibility
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Once falling under the right to privacy as a mere sub-set, now the right to data protection enjoys
a fundamental status. The introduction of the famous General Data Protection Regulation
marks especially an important step towards elevating the status of the fundamental right to
data protection. The new Regulation provides a stronger framework for contested issues such
as consent under a strong accountability regime, however mere compliance with the law is
not sufficient. This paper emphasizes the need for an integrated ethical approach, which
combines ‘the concern for the law’ with a very strong emphasis on managerial responsibility
for the firms’ organizational privacy behaviors. What is ultimately required is a value-driven
data protection approach, executed by privacy officers with due concern for the very real
impact that data related practices may have on the lives of people.
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Brandford, A. ‘The brussels effect’ (2012) 107(1) Northwestern University Law Review.
2.
Fried, C. ‘Privacy’ in Schoeman, F.D. (ed.), Philosophical dimensions of privacy (1984, Cambridge University Press) 209.
3.
Chan, Y.E. and Greenaway, K.E. ‘Theoretical explanations for firms’ information privacy behaviors’ (2005) 6 no.6 Journal of the Association for Information Systems 171.
4.
Costa, L. and Poullet, Y. ‘Privacy and the regulation of 2012’ (2012) 28 no. 3 Computer Law & Security Review.
5.
Culnan, M.J. and Williams, C.C.‘How ethics can enhance organizational privacy: lessons from the choicepoint and TJX data breaches’ (2009) Mis Quarterly 673.
6.
Dammann, U., Mallmann, O. and Simitis, S. ‘Data Protection Legislation: An International Documentation’ Engl.–German: ‘Eine internationale Dokumentation: Die Gesetzgebung zum Datenschutz’ (Frankfurt am Main: Metzner 1977).
7.
González, G. ‘The emergence of personal data protection as a fundamental right of the EU’ (2014) Vol. 16 Springer Science & Business chapter 5.
8.
Goodin, R. ‘Protecting the vulnerable’ (1985); A.M. Marcoux, ‘A fiduciary argument against stakeholder theory’ (2004) 13 no.1 Business Ethics Quarterly 1.
9.
Guagnin, G., Hempel, L., Ilten, C., Kroener, I., Neyland, D., and Postigo, H. ‘Managing privacy through accountability’ (Eds.) (2012, Springer). See also: D. Aspinall, J. Camenisch, M. Hansen, S. Fischer-Hübner and C. Raab, ‘Privacy and Identity Management. Time for a Revolution?’ (Eds.) International Summer School, Edinburgh, UK, August 16-21, 2015, Revised Selected Papers. (2016 Springer Vol. 476).
10.
Hijmans, H. ‘The European Union as Guardian of Internet Privacy: The Story of Art 16 TFEU’ Vol31 (2016) Springer.
11.
Hondius, F. W. ‘Emerging Data Protection in Europe’ (Amsterdam North-Holland 1975); H. Burkert, ‘Freedom of Information and Data Protection’ (Bonn: Gesellschaft für Mathematik und Datenverarbeitung 1983).
12.
Moor, J.H. ‘Why we need better ethics for emerging technologies’ (2005) 7 no. 3 Ethics and information technology 111.
13.
Nissenbaum, H. ‘A contextual approach to privacy online’ (2011) 140 no. 4 Daedalus.
14.
Reghelin, A. ‘The principle of accountability as anticipated by the article 29 Data Protection Working Party’ (2017) E-Privacy.
15.
Rouvroy, A. and Poullet, Y. ‘The Right to Informational Self-Determination and the Value of Self-Development: Reassessing the Importance of Privacy for Democracy’ in: S. Gutwirth, Y. Poullet, P. De Hert, C. de Terwangne and S. Nouwt (eds) Reinventing Data Protection? (2009 Springer, Dordrecht) 46.
16.
van der Sloot, B. ‘Legal Fundamentalism: Is Data Protection Really a Fundamental Right?’ 2017. In Leenes, R., Van Brakel, R., Gutwirth, S., & De Hert, P. (Eds.) Data Protection and Privacy: (In)visibilities and Infrastructures (2017, Vol 36, New York, Springer).
17.
van der Sloot, B. ‘Do data protection rules protect the individual and should they? An assessment of the proposed General Data Protection Regulation’ (2014) 4 no.4 International Data Privacy Law 307. van der Sloot, B. ‘Legal Fundamentalism: Is Data Protection Really a Fundamental Right?’ 2017. In Leenes, R., Van Brakel, R., Gutwirth, S., & De Hert, P. (Eds.) Data Protection and Privacy: (In)visibilities and Infrastructures (2017, Vol 36, New York, Springer) 2.
18.
Solove, D.J. ‘I’ve Got Nothing to Hide’ and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy’ (2007) 44 :Fall San Diego Law Review 745.
19.
Sunstein, C. R. ‘Why societies need dissent’ (2005) Vol. 9. Harvard University Press 157.
20.
Schwartz, P.M. ‘The EU-US privacy collision: a turn to institutions and procedures’ (2013).
21.
Rule, J.M. Privacy in peril: How we are sacrificing a fundamental right in exchange for security and convenience (2007 Oxford University Press) 168.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
