PL EN
Wydawnictwo
AWSGE
Akademia Nauk Stosowanych
WSGE
im. Alcide De Gasperi
BOOK CHAPTER (53-64)
The right to life – some roman perspectives in modern law
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski” Faculty of Law, Sofia, Bulgaria
 
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
One of the fundamental questions related to legal universalism is the proclamation and protection of the right to life. In relation to the therein proclaimed right to life, there is another heavily contested right today and namely “the right to being born”, i.e. the right to life of the human embryo. It is a clear manifestation of universal regulation of this basic human right on the one hand and of its framework in terms of a particular problem which, however, bears significant social, moral and legal consequences – for the protection of pregnant women and the children in their wombs, the recognition of paternity and parental rights, respectively the right to child support for the unborn, the right to abortion, assisted reproduction, surrogacy, cloning, etc. The fundamental theoretical legal question is what comes to the fore about the moment when the legal person starts its existence, respectively from the moment when law recognizes the presence of life, i.e. of a living creature, and to what extent this reflects upon the status of the mother, etc. The article presents the main texts of the Roman law, which relate to such problems as the basis of modern legislation and its improvement.
 
REFERENCES (15)
1.
Amunátegui Perelló, C.F. (2014) Human rights and natural law in antiquity. A question of origins. – In: Fundamina 20 (1), pp. 15-26;.
 
2.
Baccari, M.P. (2006) La difesa del concepito nel diritto romano, Torino: Giappichelli.
 
3.
Baccari, M.P. (2012) Il curator ventris. Il concepito, la donna e la res res publica tra storia ed attualità. Torino: Giappichelli.
 
4.
Berger, A. (1953) Encyclopedic dictionary of Roman Law. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society, p. 487.
 
5.
Bernard, Ch., Deleury, Ed., Dion, Fr. , Gaudette, p. (1989)Le statut de l’embryon humain dans l’Antiquité grécoromaine. – In : Laval théologique et philosophique, 452, p. 180-182.
 
6.
Burnyeat, M.F. (1994) Did the ancient Greeks have the concept of human rights? In: Polis:The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought, 13 (1-2), pp.1 – 11.
 
7.
Catalano, P. (1990) Diritto e persone. Studi su origine e attualità del sistema romano, v.I, Torino: Giappichelli, p. 216 ss.; Lubrano, M. (2002) Persona e homo nell’opera di Gaio. Elementi concettuali del sistema giuridico romano, Torino: Giappichelli , p. 3 ss.
 
8.
Di Nisio, V. (2016) A proposito dei partus ancillarum peculiari. – In: INDEX, 44 p. 141-153.
 
9.
Fernández de Buján, F. (2017) Іl diritto alla vita. Una riflessione dall`esterno del diritto. – In: IUS ROMANUM,1, available 26.07.2018 at http://iusromanum.eu/documents....
 
10.
Ferreti, P. (1999) In rerum natura esse, in rerum humanum nondum esse. L’identità del concepito nel pensiero giusprudenziale classico, Diritto romano e diritto europeo: alcune considerazioni in tema “ qui intero sunt. – in: Annali della Universita di Ferrara, 13, p. 97-127.
 
11.
Fontana, G. (1994) Qui in utero sunt. Concetti antichi e condizione giuridica del nascituro nella codificazione di Giustiniano, Torino : Giappichelli.
 
12.
Novkirishka-Stoyanova, M. (2016) Istoricheski koreni na pravata na choveka. [Historical roots of human rights ]. In: Society and Law, 7, p. 100 ss.(in Bulgarian).
 
13.
Ovcharov, V., Takeva, Ts. (2015) Tsitologiya. Obshta histologiya. Obshta embriologiya. [Cytology. General histology. General embryology.] Sofiya: Arso , p. 167 ss. (in Bulgarian).
 
14.
Steiner, H. J., Alston, P. International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals, (2nd ed), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
 
15.
Tanchev, E. (2002). Osnovni prava na choveka [Fundamental human rights]. Sofiya: Iyrispres, p. 9 ss. (in Bulgarian).
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top