To the judges were not exposed to external pressure and be able to judge in accordance with the oath they were given guarantees in the Constitution. Article 178 paragraph 1 provides that “judges in the exercise of his office, shall be independent and subject only to the Constitution and statutes” and article 178 paragraph 2 provides: “Judges shall be provided working conditions and remuneration consistent with the dignity of the office and the scope of their duties.” It is said in the provisions of the Constitution about the salary of Judges. Also in international law a lot of attention to this issue. In international law it has devoted a lot of attention to this issue. Provision to ensure adequate and appropriate level of remuneration of judges is not only strengthening social respect for members of the profession, but it is one of the guarantees of judicial independence and serves immunization judge to all the temptations of corruption. Despite all this corruption in the environment of judges is present, which confirms the case law of the disciplinary courts. The paper shows that the judicial environment is not free of corrupt behavior. This indicates that these behaviors are among the business and misconduct offenses dignity of a judge, for which the judge is liable to disciplinary action. The study was based on the available literature, issues, legislation and case-law of disciplinary courts.