PL EN
Wydawnictwo
AWSGE
Akademia Nauk Stosowanych
WSGE
im. Alcide De Gasperi
BOOK CHAPTER (56-68)
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE – (UN)JUSTIFIED AMBITIONS AND (NEEDLESS) FEARS
 
More details
Hide details
 
 
KEYWORDS
DOI: 10.13166/WSGE//NFXA5999
ABSTRACT
Artificial Intelligence is undoubtedly one of the greatest achievements of the human intellect; in a sense , it has a creative character, because here one being (i.e. a human) gives (well, maybe not quite yet, but almost) independent life to a different being. The curiosity where this will lead us humans seems to be greater than the questions of anxiety that arise on this occasion. These questions are very diverse and concern almost all aspects of human activity. The interest in the development of new technologies connected with artificial intelligence and with the future is perfectly justified, but what about the risk that is inherent in every invention; moreover, a risk that is usually proportional to its actual importance? This paper contains many questions, not at all original, expressing anxiety, for which we still do not have answers – and probably will not for a long time.
 
REFERENCES (15)
1.
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2016).
 
2.
Council Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products. (OJ L 210, 07/08/1985).
 
3.
Domański, Z. (2015). Bezpieczeństwo [Security], in: P.Chodak (ed.), Leksykon bezpieczeństwo. Wybrane pojęcia. [Lexicon of security. Selected concepts], Józefów, p. 7.
 
4.
Dziurzyński, K. (2017). Poczucie bezpieczeństwa [Sense of security], in: P.Chodak (ed.), Leksykon bezpieczeństwo. Wybrane pojęcia. [Lexicon of security. Selected concepts], Józefów, pp. 148–149.
 
5.
European Convention of Human Rights (1950).
 
6.
European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 on intellectual property rights in the field of AI technology development (2020/2015(INI)), https://www.europarl. europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9 – 2020-10-20_PL.html (March 23, 2021).
 
7.
European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 with recommendations to the Commission on a framework for the ethics of AI, robotics, and related technologies (2020/2012(INL)), https://www.europarl.europa.eu... doceo / document / TA-9- 2020-0275_PL.html (March 24, 2021).
 
8.
European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 with recommendations to the Commission on a civil liability regime for artificial intelligence (2020/2014(INL)), https://www.europarl.europa.eu... – 9-2020-0276_PL.html (March 24, 2021).
 
9.
International Human Rights Covenants (1966).
 
10.
Kopeć, K. D. (2016).Digital participation in cultural heritage. The case of open Monuments crowdsourcing platform, in: Journal of Modern Science 1/28/2016, pp. 47–64.
 
11.
Tatarkiewicz, W. (1986). O filozofii i sztuce [About philosophy and art].Warsaw.
 
12.
The post-crisis New Deal for Europe, https://cordis.europa.eu/artic... (24/03/2021).
 
13.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948).
 
14.
Winiarski, M. (2003). Bezpieczeństwo w środowisku lokalnym, [Security in the local environment], in: Encyklopedia pedagogiczna XXI wieku [Pedagogical Encyclopaedia of the 21st Century], Warsaw.vol. I, pp. 343–347.
 
15.
Zawisza, J. (2015). Cyberprzestrzeń jako zagrożenie bezpieczeństwa państwa [Cyberspace as a threat to state security], in: Journal of Modern Science 4/27/2015, pp.403–416.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top